<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Basics and Creating your Own 800 Pound Gorilla!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/03/28/seo-basics-and-creating-your-own-800-pound-gorilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/03/28/seo-basics-and-creating-your-own-800-pound-gorilla/</link>
	<description>web master resource, seo resource, seo news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/03/28/seo-basics-and-creating-your-own-800-pound-gorilla/comment-page-1/#comment-2310</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/03/28/seo-basics-and-creating-your-own-800-pound-gorilla/#comment-2310</guid>
		<description>Stuart:

Your assumption is correct, forward linking does expedite trust, so what you lose for that page (as far as link equity) you gain in trust, which can catapult multiple pages to the top of the SERPs instead. The key is to deep link 35% to the home page and 65% to related pages using the phrase you want to rank for on the target page as the deep link anchor text. In addition to that, you can link pages together (3 pages interlinked) to produce a compound ranking affect across multiple variations of the phrase. Using one of those pages for forward linking is enough, then linking to the other 2 for example can give them expression is search engines. I often call this the grappling hook technique, but it works well when used in tandem with other formulas for on page SEO and link optimization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart:</p>
<p>Your assumption is correct, forward linking does expedite trust, so what you lose for that page (as far as link equity) you gain in trust, which can catapult multiple pages to the top of the SERPs instead. The key is to deep link 35% to the home page and 65% to related pages using the phrase you want to rank for on the target page as the deep link anchor text. In addition to that, you can link pages together (3 pages interlinked) to produce a compound ranking affect across multiple variations of the phrase. Using one of those pages for forward linking is enough, then linking to the other 2 for example can give them expression is search engines. I often call this the grappling hook technique, but it works well when used in tandem with other formulas for on page SEO and link optimization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Chester</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/03/28/seo-basics-and-creating-your-own-800-pound-gorilla/comment-page-1/#comment-2307</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/03/28/seo-basics-and-creating-your-own-800-pound-gorilla/#comment-2307</guid>
		<description>Forward linking is an interesting subject I would like to learn more about, you say if you link to another source with a thorough grasp of your page subject, it can be a good way to increase search engine trust etc. So would I be correct in presuming that by placing a link to a Wikipedia page on the subject of your page content would be a positive thing to do in the search engines eyes? But would this also pass some link juice/pagerank away from your page onto theirs?
Stuart, in Chester UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forward linking is an interesting subject I would like to learn more about, you say if you link to another source with a thorough grasp of your page subject, it can be a good way to increase search engine trust etc. So would I be correct in presuming that by placing a link to a Wikipedia page on the subject of your page content would be a positive thing to do in the search engines eyes? But would this also pass some link juice/pagerank away from your page onto theirs?<br />
Stuart, in Chester UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

