<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Previous Query Reason For Crazy Google Rankings?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/</link>
	<description>web master resource, seo resource, seo news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve kason</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-23481</link>
		<dc:creator>steve kason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/#comment-23481</guid>
		<description>A great blog...excellent info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great blog&#8230;excellent info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris G</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-2313</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/#comment-2313</guid>
		<description>4 months later ... I&#039;m wondering if the organic results part of this has gone away.  I definitely see the effects on PPC results as I change my search queries, but organic results ordering is rock-solid the same.  Do you have any updates you can share?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 months later &#8230; I&#8217;m wondering if the organic results part of this has gone away.  I definitely see the effects on PPC results as I change my search queries, but organic results ordering is rock-solid the same.  Do you have any updates you can share?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Drinks a Fighting Problem &#124; Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Drinks a Fighting Problem &#124; Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 06:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/#comment-951</guid>
		<description>[...] experience is by no means unique. As Jaan Kanellis recently wrote in Google Previous Query Reason For Crazy Google Rankings? on SiteProNews, &#8220;I swear I must answer these types of questions two dozen times on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] experience is by no means unique. As Jaan Kanellis recently wrote in Google Previous Query Reason For Crazy Google Rankings? on SiteProNews, &#8220;I swear I must answer these types of questions two dozen times on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google swings and erratic behavior influences lead generation : The LEADSExplorer Blog: Lead generation - Website visitors - CRM - B2B</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>Google swings and erratic behavior influences lead generation : The LEADSExplorer Blog: Lead generation - Website visitors - CRM - B2B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/#comment-939</guid>
		<description>[...] Drinks a Fighting Problem  Tuesday, May 27, 2008 on The WebMarketCentral Blog – by Tom Pick. - Google Previous Query Reason For Crazy Google Rankings? 25 April 2008 on SiteProNews by Jaan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drinks a Fighting Problem  Tuesday, May 27, 2008 on The WebMarketCentral Blog – by Tom Pick. &#8211; Google Previous Query Reason For Crazy Google Rankings? 25 April 2008 on SiteProNews by Jaan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monika Maeckle</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Monika Maeckle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/#comment-491</guid>
		<description>What an insightful find.  I work for a press release wire service and frequently our clients wonder why certain press releases rank higher than others with the same keyword optimization.  THIS explains some of it--it depends on what the searcher was searching for PRIOR.  Very interesting.  Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an insightful find.  I work for a press release wire service and frequently our clients wonder why certain press releases rank higher than others with the same keyword optimization.  THIS explains some of it&#8211;it depends on what the searcher was searching for PRIOR.  Very interesting.  Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjewelled</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>bjewelled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/04/25/google-previous-query-reason-for-crazy-google-rankings/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>I find it hard to understand what possible benefit this could bring to searchers? It sounds like Google will be presenting a more and more biased (?) view of the web and, for me, a less and less useful one.

Maybe I am picking this up wrong but the logic seems flawed; if I do consecutive searches on similar themes it is usually because I cannot find what I am looking for. If Google are going to show results biased by those earlier searches then returns are going to be increasingly irrelevant and I start using another search engine.

As for Google trying to create links between unrelated search terms, it is no more than speculation on their part. If they hit the target great but if they more often miss then, again, it is likely to send people to other search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hard to understand what possible benefit this could bring to searchers? It sounds like Google will be presenting a more and more biased (?) view of the web and, for me, a less and less useful one.</p>
<p>Maybe I am picking this up wrong but the logic seems flawed; if I do consecutive searches on similar themes it is usually because I cannot find what I am looking for. If Google are going to show results biased by those earlier searches then returns are going to be increasingly irrelevant and I start using another search engine.</p>
<p>As for Google trying to create links between unrelated search terms, it is no more than speculation on their part. If they hit the target great but if they more often miss then, again, it is likely to send people to other search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

