<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash is Still Too Flashy for Competitive SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/flash-is-still-too-flashy-for-competitive-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/flash-is-still-too-flashy-for-competitive-seo/</link>
	<description>web master resource, seo resource, seo news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAL Web Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/flash-is-still-too-flashy-for-competitive-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>SAL Web Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/flash-is-still-too-flashy-for-competitive-seo/#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>I agree, look very closely at how you use flash and use it sparingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, look very closely at how you use flash and use it sparingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/flash-is-still-too-flashy-for-competitive-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/flash-is-still-too-flashy-for-competitive-seo/#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe that SEO can really be done on flash just yet.  I think if anything it&#039;s more a case of the standard text in flash can finally be read.  This would equate to little more than the old optimisation mantra - &quot;Content is King!&quot;

If you have the content, then possibly an all flash site may rank.  But I&#039;m still going to go with text and use flash sparingly - at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe that SEO can really be done on flash just yet.  I think if anything it&#8217;s more a case of the standard text in flash can finally be read.  This would equate to little more than the old optimisation mantra &#8211; &#8220;Content is King!&#8221;</p>
<p>If you have the content, then possibly an all flash site may rank.  But I&#8217;m still going to go with text and use flash sparingly &#8211; at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lillicotch.com</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/flash-is-still-too-flashy-for-competitive-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>Lillicotch.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/flash-is-still-too-flashy-for-competitive-seo/#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>[...] Read - Flash is Still Too Flashy for Competitive SEO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read &#8211; Flash is Still Too Flashy for Competitive SEO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

