<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Search Engine Has Google Nervous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/</link>
	<description>web master resource, seo resource, seo news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: south africa villa</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/comment-page-1/#comment-18377</link>
		<dc:creator>south africa villa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/#comment-18377</guid>
		<description>Good attempt, keep working at it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good attempt, keep working at it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hooper</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/comment-page-1/#comment-5441</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/#comment-5441</guid>
		<description>Ok - I did a search for my sites main keywords and I appear absolutely nowhere, even though I am ranked very highly by google, msn and yahoo.

the results it returned were not even related to my search phrase &quot;holiday rentals in spain&quot;. there were rental companies from the States!!

Also some sites were repeated 2 or 3 times and teh images they displayed were totally irrelevant.

just because it has been built by a few ex google employees it doesnt mean squat.

Google has 10&#039;s of thousands of employees!

Verdict 1/10 (the 1 is just for trying)

Brian Hooper
http://www.myspanishrental.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok &#8211; I did a search for my sites main keywords and I appear absolutely nowhere, even though I am ranked very highly by google, msn and yahoo.</p>
<p>the results it returned were not even related to my search phrase &#8220;holiday rentals in spain&#8221;. there were rental companies from the States!!</p>
<p>Also some sites were repeated 2 or 3 times and teh images they displayed were totally irrelevant.</p>
<p>just because it has been built by a few ex google employees it doesnt mean squat.</p>
<p>Google has 10&#8242;s of thousands of employees!</p>
<p>Verdict 1/10 (the 1 is just for trying)</p>
<p>Brian Hooper<br />
<a href="http://www.myspanishrental.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.myspanishrental.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike's Notation Software</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/comment-page-1/#comment-3781</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike's Notation Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/#comment-3781</guid>
		<description>The results are poor and in a lot of cases, duplicated.  For example, on a single page you may see 3 or 4 same domain names for a particular keyword.  Google does this sometimes too, but at most they list 2 same domain searches on a results page which.  The images next to the results are a dumb idea because they are never relevant and some companies may not want a particular image next to their results.  I know for a fact that I own a certain term on the web (Google, Yahoo, MSN and many others) list me as #1 for my search term.  Cuil does not list me anywhere for that phrase.  Yes, I can safely say that because Cuil did not recognize that my phrase (which is the name of my website) is not even in the vicinity of the results, that is has a lot of improvement to do.  Google has nothing to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The results are poor and in a lot of cases, duplicated.  For example, on a single page you may see 3 or 4 same domain names for a particular keyword.  Google does this sometimes too, but at most they list 2 same domain searches on a results page which.  The images next to the results are a dumb idea because they are never relevant and some companies may not want a particular image next to their results.  I know for a fact that I own a certain term on the web (Google, Yahoo, MSN and many others) list me as #1 for my search term.  Cuil does not list me anywhere for that phrase.  Yes, I can safely say that because Cuil did not recognize that my phrase (which is the name of my website) is not even in the vicinity of the results, that is has a lot of improvement to do.  Google has nothing to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web design</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/comment-page-1/#comment-2614</link>
		<dc:creator>web design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/#comment-2614</guid>
		<description>nice to have competition like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice to have competition like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helmut Steinebrunner</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/comment-page-1/#comment-2572</link>
		<dc:creator>Helmut Steinebrunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/#comment-2572</guid>
		<description>Not so fast, saying Google killer, especially when I produced a web site less than a week and a half ago. Then had it spider by Google, MSN and Yahoo.  I have top 10 search ranking now. But Cuil is still searching for my web site.  I think let&#039;s talk about some years down the road may be then Mc cool will get theirs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so fast, saying Google killer, especially when I produced a web site less than a week and a half ago. Then had it spider by Google, MSN and Yahoo.  I have top 10 search ranking now. But Cuil is still searching for my web site.  I think let&#8217;s talk about some years down the road may be then Mc cool will get theirs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UtahLuxury.com</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/comment-page-1/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>UtahLuxury.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>I would love to see a few of Googles stupid dominating features like PR be challenged but I dont think this engine has the ability or the capacity to deliver anything close to what Google has done with search results. Merely spidering a website and then delivering results doesnt mean you have the right results. It doesnt mean mean you have &quot;Good Info&quot; either. I even think the styling of the typography that is delivered makes it hard to browse the results.

I do however like the design of the site and think it has potential. Maybe a few tweaks would make the site more user friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see a few of Googles stupid dominating features like PR be challenged but I dont think this engine has the ability or the capacity to deliver anything close to what Google has done with search results. Merely spidering a website and then delivering results doesnt mean you have the right results. It doesnt mean mean you have &#8220;Good Info&#8221; either. I even think the styling of the typography that is delivered makes it hard to browse the results.</p>
<p>I do however like the design of the site and think it has potential. Maybe a few tweaks would make the site more user friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/comment-page-1/#comment-2357</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/#comment-2357</guid>
		<description>Um... just because they don&#039;t rank your website that you have optimised, doesn&#039;t make them a poor search engine.  I think that might have some play on some of the comments made.  My site doesn&#039;t rank so it&#039;s got to be poor.  I think the worst is that they can&#039;t match images from the same site, never mind relevant ones.  But hey... lets hope they can fix that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230; just because they don&#8217;t rank your website that you have optimised, doesn&#8217;t make them a poor search engine.  I think that might have some play on some of the comments made.  My site doesn&#8217;t rank so it&#8217;s got to be poor.  I think the worst is that they can&#8217;t match images from the same site, never mind relevant ones.  But hey&#8230; lets hope they can fix that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comedy Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/comment-page-1/#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator>Comedy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/#comment-2229</guid>
		<description>Google is nervous? No seriously, you&#039;re kidding right?

The engine has terrible results. They might reshape it, and it might get better, but they really should have waited to send out those press releases. It only took me about 3 searches to realize that I don&#039;t need to go back anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is nervous? No seriously, you&#8217;re kidding right?</p>
<p>The engine has terrible results. They might reshape it, and it might get better, but they really should have waited to send out those press releases. It only took me about 3 searches to realize that I don&#8217;t need to go back anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primal Media</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/comment-page-1/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>Primal Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>At this time, it&#039;s all smoke and mirrors. Cuil has some major stumbling blocks before it will come anywhere close to making Google nervous – including the fact that its results are junk and it randomly pulls images to match results that often bear no relation to the business listed. 

The fact that they deliver up so little results despite exaggerated claims about indexing will be enough to deter most who even bother to check it out. Packaging without substance cannot make a giant like Google topple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this time, it&#8217;s all smoke and mirrors. Cuil has some major stumbling blocks before it will come anywhere close to making Google nervous – including the fact that its results are junk and it randomly pulls images to match results that often bear no relation to the business listed. </p>
<p>The fact that they deliver up so little results despite exaggerated claims about indexing will be enough to deter most who even bother to check it out. Packaging without substance cannot make a giant like Google topple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin A. Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/comment-page-1/#comment-2217</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin A. Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-has-google-nervous/#comment-2217</guid>
		<description>The biggest index means nothing if you can&#039;t deliver the pages for relevant searches. I went to Cuil and typed charleston ghost tours (a main keyword for one of my clients) and Cuil delivered zero results. I found a couple of other phrases with the same zero results, though I don&#039;t recall what they were right now. Cuil has a lot of work to do in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest index means nothing if you can&#8217;t deliver the pages for relevant searches. I went to Cuil and typed charleston ghost tours (a main keyword for one of my clients) and Cuil delivered zero results. I found a couple of other phrases with the same zero results, though I don&#8217;t recall what they were right now. Cuil has a lot of work to do in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

