Comments on: Page Rank Sculpting – Dead or Alive? http://www.sitepronews.com/2009/06/26/page-rank-sculpting-dead-or-alive/ web master resource, seo resource, seo news Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:01:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Insurance http://www.sitepronews.com/2009/06/26/page-rank-sculpting-dead-or-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-12467 Insurance Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:07:57 +0000 http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=3764#comment-12467 @Bill Pat: Agreed. @Bill Pat: Agreed.

]]> By: web development firm USA http://www.sitepronews.com/2009/06/26/page-rank-sculpting-dead-or-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-11211 web development firm USA Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:59:47 +0000 http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=3764#comment-11211 Thanks for posting this useful and informative article Thanks for posting this useful and informative article

]]> By: Page Rank Sculpting – Dead or Alive? | Axis Web Host http://www.sitepronews.com/2009/06/26/page-rank-sculpting-dead-or-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-11106 Page Rank Sculpting – Dead or Alive? | Axis Web Host Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:04:20 +0000 http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=3764#comment-11106 [...] Page Rank Sculpting – Dead or Alive? June 26th, 2009 | Categories: Webmaster Articles | Tags: Cutt, Dead Alive, Dead Or Alive, Denominator, Google, Hullabaloo, Matt Cutts, Page Rank, Pagerank, Smx Advanced, Stink, Vector [...] [...] Page Rank Sculpting – Dead or Alive? June 26th, 2009 | Categories: Webmaster Articles | Tags: Cutt, Dead Alive, Dead Or Alive, Denominator, Google, Hullabaloo, Matt Cutts, Page Rank, Pagerank, Smx Advanced, Stink, Vector [...]

]]> By: Bill Platt http://www.sitepronews.com/2009/06/26/page-rank-sculpting-dead-or-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-11099 Bill Platt Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:00:23 +0000 http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=3764#comment-11099 Tee hee... Have we ever considered that google tells us to build websites for humans and not for the search engines? If we are building for humans and not for search engines, why in the world would we include rel=nofollow on any links? That leaves me to believe that the rel=nofollow, which to my knowledge is only used by google, is a trigger identifier of someone interested in manipulated google's search results. If google did not have its secrets, wouldn't the no=follow tags indicate that google should step up its close analysis of a particular website? How is that for "food for thought"? Tee hee… Have we ever considered that google tells us to build websites for humans and not for the search engines? If we are building for humans and not for search engines, why in the world would we include rel=nofollow on any links?

That leaves me to believe that the rel=nofollow, which to my knowledge is only used by google, is a trigger identifier of someone interested in manipulated google’s search results. If google did not have its secrets, wouldn’t the no=follow tags indicate that google should step up its close analysis of a particular website?

How is that for “food for thought”?

]]> By: Club Penguin http://www.sitepronews.com/2009/06/26/page-rank-sculpting-dead-or-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-11098 Club Penguin Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:00:21 +0000 http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=3764#comment-11098 Page Rank explained away again! Does google really want anyone to know what they are up to! I think if you narrow it down to keyword ranking and actual traffic results then you will be in a much better position to analyze the worth of a site. That is what it comes down to anyway since people are looking for link value. Page Rank explained away again! Does google really want anyone to know what they are up to!

I think if you narrow it down to keyword ranking and actual traffic results then you will be in a much better position to analyze the worth of a site. That is what it comes down to anyway since people are looking for link value.

]]> By: Bill Platt http://www.sitepronews.com/2009/06/26/page-rank-sculpting-dead-or-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-11097 Bill Platt Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:53:11 +0000 http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=3764#comment-11097 Devalued? Yes. Dead. Doubtful. Devalued? Yes. Dead. Doubtful.

]]>