Site   Web

July 7, 2011

SEO: Then and Now – A SPN Exclusive Article

SEOptimization

SEO has been around more or less as long as there have been search engines. Although it seems like some blogger or another is heralding the impending death of SEO every few months or so, SEO has yet to fade into oblivion. The very core of SEO is to change; to make adjustments to one’s site to adapt to the search engines’ algorithms, the changes in consumers’ online behavior, the expanding online world and so forth. SEO isn’t about to die anytime soon, but it is constantly evolving to meet the needs and challenges of the times.

This is a look at SEO as it was in 2004 and how it has morphed to fit the modern world of 2011.

SEO: IT or Marketing Department?

Back in 2004, many marketing departments looked at SEO as a technology and not as a marketing tool. It was all about coding and web development and was often lumped in with other IT “stuff.” The singular goal of SEO was to get a site to rank number one in the search engines for a given keyword. Period. Now, SEO is tied in with every aspect of online marketing. SEO can be used to build a brand and online reputation, help create a community of targeted consumers, and more. Rank is no longer the principle focus, albeit still a very important result. Nowadays, SEO is squarely about marketing.

Linking Best Practices

Links were and continue to be the bread and butter of SEO. However, the way companies go about building inbound links has dramatically changed over time. In 2004, I was working for a large SEM firm. We had a full-time employee that was hired solely to develop link exchanges for our clients. Since then, link exchanges, paid links, spammy anchor text, cloaking, and the like have all been soundly labeled “black hat” by the search engines. Directory submissions were wildly popular in the early days of SEO, and while there are a few good ones left that can provide a quality link, they aren’t usually valuable for much else.

Nowadays, link building is synonymous with trust building. If you were to compare a very spammy, black hat site to a quality site, you would find that the spammy site (even if it has more links) is usually linked to/from other low quality sites. A website that is seen as an authority figure will have a much more diverse and valuable link portfolio, even if it is smaller. In 2004, quantity could trump quality. That is no longer the case for 2011.

Search Engines

Remember when AOL was King of the Internet? Now we all giggle at anyone who still actively uses the former giant. What about InfoSeek or AskJeeves? Do you still search using AltaVista? In the early days, the Internet was littered with various search engines, each with unique pros and cons. In 2004, Google was just one of many. Now, we use Google as a verb when we want someone to conduct a search. The general consensus of many SEO professionals is that when we optimize a company’s site, we are going after the Google SERP. Bing has been slowly chipping away at Google’s share of the search market, but for the most part Google is still the dominant player.

SEO Tools

Back in 2004, conducting keyword research was the single worst part of SEO. You couldn’t trust any data on search volume to be accurate, so in the end we pretty much had to guess. I remember sitting down with a thesaurus to come up with keyword variations! Good keyword research tools didn’t exist. Can you imagine optimizing each page of a 1,000 page website with no data to guide you? Luckily, today we have the Google Keyword research tool to make that task much easier and help streamline the process.

Google Analytics, a tool every responsible website owner should use, was only fully implemented in 2006! Before then, site owners had to buy analytics software or use a generic hit counter (which didn’t tell you anything much other than number of visitors) to monitor their site’s analytics. Nowadays, we don’t make any changes, big or small, to a website without first consulting our Google Analytics information. The information found there helps shape and adapt our SEO campaigns for the better, and we can make decisions knowing they will point us in the right direction.

Social Media and Sharing

Social media didn’t really exist in 2004. Facebook, the 800 pound gorilla of social networking sites, was barely operational in early 2004. We certainly didn’t have Twitter and LinkedIn. While smaller social networking sites did exist, social media as we know it really exploded in recent years. Back in 2004, if you wanted to connect with someone online, you sent them an e-mail or an IM message. Now we message, Tweet, post, share, Like, bookmark, and much more. Content gets passed from person to person at astonishing speeds. We can build relationships with people halfway around the world all thanks to social networking.

SEO has even begun to envelop social media. The search engines have started incorporating data from social networking sites into their algorithms to help organize search results. Suddenly, the information your friends used to share on Facebook or Twitter amongst yourselves is impacting the general search results.

Mobile

The first smartphone, a BlackBerry, was released in 2003. The concept that you could be connected to your e-mail wherever you went and without a computer was revolutionary. Suddenly the Internet was mobile. The subsequent iPhone releases and Android phones furthered our online connectivity, and now smartphones are dominating the cell phone market. Local search has become an increasingly important part of SEO, all because of mobile phones and tablets. Google Maps didn’t even exist in 2004, yet now we can search for an address and get directions on our GPS enabled mobile devices.

Consumers and companies alike want to be able to connect with each other on the go. Since we never have to disconnect from our online lives, mobile marketing has developed to allow companies to target consumers no matter where they are or what they are doing.

This is by no means an exhaustive list of all the changes that SEO has undergone, just in the last 7 years. But hopefully this has given you a better idea of just how much the game has changed. The next time you read a blog or article that says SEO is dead, remember that SEO doesn’t really die. It just evolves to meet the needs to the times.


Nick Stamoulis is the President and Founder of Brick Marketing a full-service Boston SEO firm that also offers social media marketing management services. With over 12 years of Internet marketing experience, Nick Stamoulis shares his knowledge by posting daily SEO tips to his blog, the Search Engine Optimization Journal. Contact Nick Stamoulis at 781-350-4365 or nick@brickmarketing.com

13 Responses to “SEO: Then and Now – A SPN Exclusive Article

    Very nice article thanx for the SEO history :d

    Very good and to the point article on SEO.

    Must have taken a lot of thought to condense all that info into one relatively short article – well done Nick.

    Cheers,
    Kitty.

    The rate of change truly is staggering. Maybe Ray Kurzweil isn’t a crackpot. 😀

    avatar cmsbuffet says:

    1 important difference is Google Webmaster Tools

    Thanks for the interesting article. Only comment I would make is that LinkedIn appeared in 2003. It was around before Facbook.

    or rather, “Facebook”…

    Good point! But NO ONE used facebook for marketing back in 2003 when it started…

    Take Care,
    Nick

    avatar Lynne says:

    I’m constantly fixing websites that have been ‘optimised’ by an ‘SEO specialist’ who has used 2004 black hat techniques! THEN, they really perform!
    Cheers
    Lynne

    avatar findable says:

    hehehe, good article
    many Ceo will never understand and notice this difference “IT or Marketing Department?” – “of course – IT department” – they will say :)

    thanks for sharing, i’m looking for the ways how to build a new web site,that’s helpful to me.

    avatar Ahmed says:

    The changes Google has made to it’s algorithm has impacted many Websites in a negative way.
    Many Webmasters have to know scrap upto 7 years of hard work and suddenly adapt to this new technique that is supposed to be better?
    SEO will never die but these changes has given the Major Companies an even bigger advantage, which they didn’t need.
    The only positive I see coming from this is it gives us a fresh start, and the first few people to master this “new” SEO will really enjoy themselves. Google changing their algorithm is nothing NEW, but the significance between changes has never been this huge. I just don’t see the need for a complete make over! was it that bad before?

    awesome post thank you ..I can found very good articles and subjects here bravo..

    avatar SEO Bedford says:

    Impressive how things changed over the years but that is the natural law of things: Evolution. I just don’t agree with one bit of this article. I don’t consider link exchanges to be blakc hat nor the SEs if it done naturally. The odd link exchange with an industry related website can be healthy for both sides.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *






You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 3,851,732 bad guys.

css.php