Site   Web

November 8, 2011

Internet Video Formats: Which is Best for Video Marketing? – A SPN Exclusive Article

spn_exclusive

OK, so you’ve decided that getting some web video on your website and social media profiles is a great idea to make you more appealing to prospects and put your SEO (search engine optimization) on HGH. You realize that video marketing is a key part of your overall search engine marketing and social media strategy. Bully for you! Now onto the tech stuff. Video formats can be mind-boggling and vary depending on the equipment the video was shot with, the type of computer you use, and the final destination where you want to host and serve up your on-demand video as part of your video marketing plan.

So which is best for you?

Lorraine Grula provides these tips from her years of experience as a top shelf video photographer and producer in ReelSEO.

Web Video Guidelines

Depending on whether you are doing research to get started with web video or if you are making use of existing equipment and software, you may be limited to formats below:

* Raw Video Format — As determined by your camera or, nowadays, your recording software. For instance, the software I record SmartVu Video Interviews with processes raw video the best when saved as Windows Movie (.wmv). I have a PC based application. Your camera or software may have a different standard, especially if you are utilizing a MAC.

* Editing Standards — Your editing software may also have a limitation on types of video it will accept and types that it works the best with. My videos are material related, not glitz and glamour, so I use programs like Corel Video Studio and Windows Live Movie Maker. Most video editors will accept nearly all the basic raw video formats, but you’ll want to confirm.

* Video Platform — What type of video format works best with your online video platform that will serve as your host? Will you host it on your site? Take into account Adobe Flash for speed reasons of loading without buffering. YouTube? They convert your incoming video to Flash (.flv) for display. If you’re using a 3rd party, inquire about their favored video format.

Obviously if you have a mismatch in your video camera output and your editor, for instance, you’re up a creek without a paddle and will need to convert your raw video to be accepted by the editor. Avoid this, as every conversion results in quality loss for the video. Try to avoid too many conversions.

Resolution versus File Size

Look, with internet video marketing, you are facing a tradeoff between two things when recording, editing and finishing videos: resolution and file size. Lorraine describes compatibility too in the ReelSEO piece, and we talked about that already. The better the quality, the larger the file size (usually), and that means the longer the buffer when loading the video on your player upon demand (especially if uploaded directly from your site server). If you want extra clear quality, the first thing you need is a work-horse computer loaded up with RAM and a uber-fast processor. I am a PC guy and I had to get an I-7 Dell to accommodate recording Hi-Def video. My old PC (5 years old) could not manage the large files without Japanese Monster Movie style mis-tracking between voice and image and I was obliged to record at lower resolutions until upgrading.

The Main Video Formats for Web Video

If you ‘re looking for the best of both worlds and your hardware can handle the recording and editing, see this brief (did I say brief?) analysis of web video formats you’ll be using:

Windows Media Video (.wmv)

This is the basic PC video file format that comes with Windows set up for Windows Media Player. It is well-known, yields reasonable quality and a pretty small file size. Want higher quality? Record or finish-edit at a higher resolution and the file size goes up accordingly. The advantage of .wmv is that it’s standard with all Windows PCs and, if shot in low enough resolution, can really be small enough to share via email. I use this format for SmartVu Video Interviews and then stream them on YouTube, and they convert without much problem with nice finish quality.

Audio-Video Interlaced (.avi)

This is the original video format from Microsoft and has a tendency to yield very large files unacceptable for sharing, but of good quality for master files. For sharing, most videographers finish-edit the file in another format to reduce file size. According to Grula there is some inconsistency with the codecs (tech video term here) depending on the recording device, making .avi not a great choice for small business video and novice producers.

Motion Picture Experts Group MPEG-4 (.mp4)

Growing numbers of video producers online are digging .mp4 as the format of choice. It has the H-264 compression codec which is considered top drawer, and is quickly becoming the standard output of camcorders and video cameras. For online sharing the .mp4 format is moving toward the universal choice and in fact is recommended by YouTube, the big fish in the platform market.

Apple Quick Time (.mov)

This format has been around a while and is standard from Apple Quick Time, but is not restricted to Macs. File sizes are big and quality is high. If super-tight quality is your concern, this may be your format.

Flash Video (.flv)

This is the most prevalent file format on the web today, playable in the Adobe Flash Player which is standard on 99% of all computers. Video sharing sites like YouTube, Vimeo, etc. take your existing videos and convert to flash for streaming to watchers of the site. File sizes are small, it streams fast, and the flash player can start playing the videos while they are still loading which is fantastic for longer videos (5 min or longer). If you host video on your own server, converting to .flv is almost a requirement for user experience. I have used the Riva converter to convert some .wmv files to flash and noticed quality degradation in exchange for the file size and speed issue; nevertheless, YouTube conversions seem to be very clear.

Tips

Here is my suggestion to small business owners and entrepreneurs looking to get into video marketing on their sites and social media profiles.

Record raw footage in the best possible format for your device. If that is .mp4, you’re one step ahead of the game.

When editing, complete the video in .mp4. Test to see if your quality is acceptable with no degradation. MPEG-4 is much easier to upload and move around. If you see a quality reduction, save finish edits to the same file format as your raw footage.

Upload your videos to a video sharing platform. I recommend YouTube. It is the biggest, gets the most traffic by far, and let’s face it Google now owns YouTube. If you’re streaming video on your website from YouTube or another site, which one do you think will get the best SEO results and page 1 positioning? YouTube will convert to either .mp4 or .flv and do a fine job with it, taking that off your plate.

Now you just need to learn how to use YouTube without providing 100 options for people to abandon your video and go somewhere else. I’ll tell you more on that in a later post.


Is your Video Marketing not getting the prospects you want? Karl Walinskas of Smart Company Growth helps business SEO with Video Interview Marketing to spur traffic and build expertise and trust. He works with firms on Growth Strategy and LinkedIn Presence to get the phone ringing! Karl has authored Getting Connected Through Exceptional Leadership and been published in print and online a trillion times, maybe a billion.

7 Responses to “Internet Video Formats: Which is Best for Video Marketing? – A SPN Exclusive Article

    Great article – very helpful. Thanks.

    avatar Gordon says:

    What about HTML5? Adobe this week announced that its dropping Flash support for mobile devices and iOS devices like the iPad, iPhone and iPod touch do not support Flash anyway. The latter alone are a very large market for web video consumption.

    Recommending Flash at a time where it is fast being replaced by HTML5 is not the best advice in my opinion.

    Gordon
    Thanks for the comments. As you may have guessed, this article was written before this week. Any strategy regarding technology is time bound in today’s society to be certain. I’d be curious to see how fast this replacement takes place. The feud between Adobe and Apple is well chronicled. mp4 is still an alternative.

    This may be the most helpful article I have ever encountered. The most confusing thing about video is not deciding whether you need one – that is a must. Instead, it is wading through the various options and figuring out what is right for your site. Thanks so much!

    avatar David says:

    HTML5 Players will do good for video marketing, i found one to be good and worth mentioning here for online video marketing its HD FLV PLAYER, this player has astonishing video clarity and can be embedded in websites – visit here @ http://www.hdflvplayer.net/

    avatar Gordon says:

    I understand Karl. Thanks for responding. Your article does clear up a lot of questions on the topic. Keep up the good work.

    No worries Gordon. Keep reading and stay in touch. You can check my site for a lot more stuff on video marketing.

    Karl

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *






You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 4,197,122 bad guys.

css.php