|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|
|
AltaVista
Benefits:
Downside: So, you'll have to decide whether you feel it's worth the cost. AltaVista is the one engine where you can still use their free add URL without being placed into the same category as the huge group of "free add URL spammers," because AltaVista's free add URL process doesn't allow mass submissions. Instead, their unique "puzzle submission" process requires you to enter a submission code into the submission box, and you can only submit five URLs at no cost. So, if you want to use free add URL for one of the engines, AltaVista's is the one to use.
Total Costs So Far
Subtotal of Yearly Pay Inclusion Costs Without AltaVista:
Subtotal of Yearly Pay Inclusion Costs With AltaVista: You might be wondering why I haven't listed the Yahoo! directory in this listing of pay inclusion programs. With the way that Yahoo! now displays results, which are almost a duplication of Google results, the importance of submitting to the Yahoo! directory at a yearly cost of $299 has diminished. Depending on where things go from here with Yahoo!, having purchased the Inktomi engine, this is subject to immediate change. But, at this point in time, paying to be included in the Yahoo! directory isn't anywhere near as important as it once was. If you have good visibility in Google, you should have good visibility in Yahoo!. But, our site is brand new, and the advantage to Yahoo!'s pay inclusion program is that your site will be reviewed for possible inclusion within 7 working days. So, depending on our finances, we may want to add Yahoo!'s pay inclusion costs, just so we can get fast visibility for our new site. (According to Nielson NetRankings in October 2002, the audience reach of Yahoo! was 28.5%. Source: SearchEngineWatch.com
Total of Yearly Pay Inclusion Costs
Total of Yearly Pay Inclusion Costs
What About Google? Google is the only major engine that doesn't have a pay inclusion program. So, the only way to get your pages into the index is to let the spider find the pages on its own through links on other pages or to submit through Google's free add URL. Personally, I always let the spider find the pages on its own and never submit to Google manually. By going this route, while your site is busy being spidered by the other engines and you're busy building link popularity, by the time that Google "finds" your pages, you should have had time to build some link popularity, which we all know is so important with Google. According to Nielson NetRankings in October 2002, the audience reach of Google alone was 29.2%. Add to that AOL at 19.7%, Yahoo! at 28.5%, and Netscape at 5.5%, and it's quite easy to see the power behind Google. Source: searchenginewatch.com In Conclusion Rather than worrying about submitting your pages manually to each of the major engines, take advantage of the tremendous benefits of using pay inclusion. Then, let Google find your pages on its own, and hold off submitting to the Yahoo! directory for a while. Based on our example here, if we were submitting three pages, our total yearly cost would be either $221 or $415, depending on whether or not we chose to use AltaVista's pay inclusion program.
So, as you can see, the benefits far outweigh the costs. Repeating what I said earlier in this article, the "key" to
successful submissions these days can be summed up in two words: pay inclusion. About The Author
![]() Click Here for Printer Friendly Version of this Article
The Insider's Guide
To Dominating the Search Engines
Want a Simple Explanation of
How to Make Money Online?
EzineAnnouncer - The Ultimate Ezine Promotion Tool
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| SiteProNews - The Net's most widely read Webmaster newsletter | |
|
|