SiteProNews: September 13, 2004 Feature Article

To Print: Click here or Select File/ Print from your Browser Menu.


  Article printed from SiteProNews: http://www.sitepronews.com
  HTML version available at: http://www.sitepronews.com/archives.html

Title Tags, Meta Descriptions and Keywords
By Jill Whalen

Just when I finally stopped getting the dreaded "Do I need 
commas or no commas in my Meta keyword tag" question, there's 
been a new stream of Meta tag questions being asked at the forum 
and in my email box. I'm not sure of the reason for the sudden 
interest, but it's probably because people are starting to worry 
about other engines besides Google now. I have written articles 
about all of the tags, but it seems like a brief summary is 
probably in order.

It's important to note that there's a big difference between 
Title tags, Meta description tags and Meta keywords tags. First 
of all, the Title tag is *not* a Meta tag. So if you see/hear me 
say something about Meta tags, I'm by no means talking about the 
Title tag.

Title tags are extremely important towards your goal of 
achieving high search engine rankings. What you write in these 
tags can indeed affect how your site ranks in all the major 
engines (See the recently updated "All About Title Tags" here:
.) You should 
always work your major phrases into the Title tags on your 
pages, and make sure that each page of your site uses a unique 
tag.

Meta description tags, on the other hand, don't actually appear 
to affect your rankings in the search engines. Still, they are 
very worthwhile to use because they allow you to control the 
description of your listing in some engines for some search 
queries. (See my past newsletter article, "Getting a Great Google 
Description," at .) 
The gist of that article is that your Meta description will show 
in the search results only *if* it happens to use the exact 
phrase that has been queried at the search engine. So use this 
tag for marketing purposes, i.e., to entice people to click on 
*your* link as opposed to the other 10 in the search results.

Meta keywords tags are a different animal altogether. Google, 
for one, doesn't pay any attention to it. I've tested this 
myself, and am 100% positive that Google doesn't index the words 
placed in the Meta keywords tag. Yahoo (and all of its search 
properties) plus Teoma/Ask Jeeves, do look at the Meta keywords 
tag, and do index its contents. BUT, and this is a huge BUT, 
that doesn't mean that filling this tag with the same keywords 
you've optimized your page for will boost it in the rankings.

Let me say that again.

Just because Yahoo knows what words you've put in the Meta 
keywords tag does not mean that the words you put in there will 
give your page a boost.

To me it's common sense.

Let's say you've optimized a page for "black hat SEOs."  So, 
you've used that phrase in your Title tag, you've written your 
content about black hat SEOs, and you've got some links pointing 
to the page that use "black hat SEOs" in the clickable portion 
of the link. Do you really think that also adding "black hat 
SEOs" to your Meta keywords tag would be just the thing it needs 
to get it found for that phrase in Yahoo? I don't. Maybe, just 
maybe if 2 sites were identical except one had the phrase "black 
hat SEOs" in the Meta keywords tag, that one would show first, 
but 2 sites are never identical. (Plus the engines are always 
trying to put a stop to duplicate content.)

Does this mean you shouldn't use the Meta keywords tag? No, not 
at all. You certainly don't *have to* use it, as it shouldn't 
affect your rankings for the keyword phrases that matter to you 
most; however, you could still use it for phrases that are 
somewhat obscure and just don't belong visibly on your page. I 
talked about this a couple of years ago in this article: "No 
Meta Keywords" . 
I really think that misspellings and technical synonyms are the 
best (and possibly only) use for this tag.

As to the age-old comma/no comma question (and I actually did 
get this one asked today!), it makes no difference. Commas are 
seemingly invisible to search engines, so it's pretty much the 
same thing to them whether you use them or not!

I hope this helps clear up some of the confusion about Meta 
tags, and to also clarify that when I say that Meta tags are 
dead that I'm most definitely not talking about Title tags, as 
they are not a Meta tag. And I'm not talking about the marketing 
value of a Meta description tag. Certainly, if it makes you feel 
good to use your Meta keywords tag and put your main keyword 
phrases in there, then more power to you. It won't hurt anything, 
and who knows...maybe that page that fits the "all else being 
equal" scenario will show up one day and you'll have them beat 
by a Meta keyword! ;-)

================================================================
Jill Whalen of High Rankings is an internationally recognized 
search engine optimization (http://www.highrankings.com/) 
consultant and host of the free weekly High Rankings Advisor 
search engine marketing newsletter 
(http://www.highrankings.com/advisor.htm).

She specializes in search engine optimization, SEO consultations 
and seminars. Jill's handbook, "The Nitty-gritty of Writing for 
the Search Engines" (http://www.highrankings.com/seo-writing.htm) 
teaches business owners how and where to place relevant keyword 
phrases on their Web sites so that they make sense to users and 
gain high rankings in the major search engines.
================================================================


Copyright © 2004 Jayde Online, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.

SiteProNews is a registered service mark of Jayde Online, Inc.