<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SiteProNews: Webmaster News &#38; Resources &#187; Kalena Jordan&#8217;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepronews.com/category/kalena-jordans-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepronews.com</link>
	<description>web master resource, seo resource, seo news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reader Rescue: How do I choose what keywords to target?</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/02/08/reader-rescue-how-do-i-choose-what-keywords-to-target/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/02/08/reader-rescue-how-do-i-choose-what-keywords-to-target/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kalena Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kalena Jordan's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=5554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kalena
I have two questions.
1) How do I know if a keyword merits my time and energy? For example, when I use Google&#8217;s Keyword tool, it says &#8220;debt settlement facts&#8221; has &#8220;not enough data&#8221; in the local search volume , when I input in &#8220;debt settlement texas,&#8221; I get 1,600 searches. Is this tool accurate [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/02/08/reader-rescue-how-do-i-choose-what-keywords-to-target/">Reader Rescue: How do I choose what keywords to target?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/question-button.jpg" alt="Question" width="116" height="106" align="right" />Hi Kalena</p>
<p>I have two questions.</p>
<p>1) How do I know if a keyword merits my time and energy? For example, when I use Google&#8217;s Keyword tool, it says &#8220;debt settlement facts&#8221; has &#8220;not enough data&#8221; in the local search volume , when I input in &#8220;debt settlement texas,&#8221; I get 1,600 searches. Is this tool accurate to estimate the potential traffic to keywords ?</p>
<p>2) How do I know which keywords my competitors are using ? What I did was check each competitors site maps and looked at individual pages to see what they were targeting.</p>
<p>William</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Hi William</p>
<p>1) It sounds like you&#8217;re using <a title="Google Adwords Keyword Tool" href="https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s PPC Keyword Tool</a>, which is helpful for choosing which keywords to target using pay per click advertising, but I&#8217;ve found it not so helpful for SEO campaigns. I would use other KW research tools such as <a title="Keyword Discovery" href="http://bit.ly/agjsZv" target="_blank">Keyword Discovery</a>, <a title="Word Tracker" href="http://bit.ly/bpbZiZ" target="_blank">Word Tracker</a> and <a title="iSpionage" href="http://bit.ly/9bzMPd" target="_blank">iSpionage</a> to get a better idea what people are typing in as search queries. All KW tools should be used with a grain of salt in terms of search data anyway &#8211; they can give you a general idea based on traffic figures, but trial and error is really your best bet when targeting keywords for your site.</p>
<p>2) Yes, looking at your competitor&#8217;s pages to see what keywords they are targeting is a very good idea. You can also view the source code for their pages to see what keywords their Title, META Description and META Keyword tags contain.</p>
<p>Kalena</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Got a Reader Rescue question of your own? Send it to kjordan [ at ] sitepronews [ dot ] com and you might see it featured here.</p>

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/02/08/reader-rescue-how-do-i-choose-what-keywords-to-target/">Reader Rescue: How do I choose what keywords to target?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/02/08/reader-rescue-how-do-i-choose-what-keywords-to-target/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s New URL Shortener: Goo.gl</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/29/googles-new-url-shortener-goo-gl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/29/googles-new-url-shortener-goo-gl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kalena Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kalena Jordan's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bit.ly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goo.gl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=5487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone needs to shorten a URL sometimes.
Whether it&#8217;s to prevent long URLs wrapping in emails, to hide affiliate links or to make links look neater in newsletters or on web pages, a URL shortening service comes in handy. These are simply tools that take long URLs and reduce them into fewer characters to make a [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/29/googles-new-url-shortener-goo-gl/">Google&#8217;s New URL Shortener: Goo.gl</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/googl.jpg" alt="" width="233" height="90" />Everyone needs to shorten a URL sometimes.</p>
<p>Whether it&#8217;s to prevent long URLs wrapping in emails, to hide affiliate links or to make links look neater in newsletters or on web pages, a URL shortening service comes in handy. These are simply tools that take long URLs and reduce them into fewer characters to make a link that is easier to share.</p>
<p>First into the market was <a title="TinyURL" href="http://www.tinyurl.com" target="_blank">TinyURL</a>,  a service that we didn&#8217;t even know we needed until it suddenly became vital. With tweets set at 140 characters, use of TinyURL went into overdrive as Twitter became more and more popular.</p>
<p>But after a while, TinyURLs weren&#8217;t tiny anymore and we started looking elsewhere. A couple of small players hit the market and then an outfit called <a title="Bit.ly" href="http://www.bit.ly" target="_blank">Bit.ly</a> started offering link shortening with built in click through stats and that was enough for most of us to ditched the competition.</p>
<p>Bit.ly became king of the URL shorteners in May 2009 when Twitter <a title="Twitter ditches TinyURL for Bit.ly" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/" target="_blank">announced</a> they were formally abandoning TinyURL to make Bit.ly their preferred shortening service. This wasn&#8217;t much of a surprise, given both Twitter and Bit.ly shared common startup investment partners. But the move meant that links from alternative URL trimmers started throwing errors if used in tweets.</p>
<p>Now Google has jumped into the URL shortening pool, with the <a title="Google launches Goo.gl" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/making-urls-shorter-for-google-toolbar.html" target="_blank">launch last month</a> of Goo.gl . At this stage, <a title="Goo.gl" href="http://goo.gl/" target="_blank">Goo.gl</a> is only available for use within Google Toolbar and Feedburner, but it&#8217;s expected to rollout for general use eventually, complete with full link tracking.</p>
<p>As TechCrunch points out in their <a title="Techcrunch on Goo.gl" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/14/goo-gl-gets-into-the-short-url-game/" target="_blank">post about the service</a>, it’s the link data that will win the war between the URL shorteners. But I have a feeling that if and when Goo.gl rolls out as a stand alone service, Twitter will need to rethink their relationship with Bit.ly.</p>

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/29/googles-new-url-shortener-goo-gl/">Google&#8217;s New URL Shortener: Goo.gl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/29/googles-new-url-shortener-goo-gl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reader Rescue: Is Google PageRank Dead?</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/26/reader-rescue-is-google-pagerank-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/26/reader-rescue-is-google-pagerank-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kalena Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kalena Jordan's Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=5465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kalena
Just wondering what your view was on PR being dead &#8211; it’s what a lot of SEO professionals are saying.
I guess I’m curious also because it seems it’s the only way to be able to track any kind of progress with our linking campaigns. What are your thoughts? Is PR dead?
Sarah
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;
Hi Sarah
Regarding the death [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/26/reader-rescue-is-google-pagerank-dead/">Reader Rescue: Is Google PageRank Dead?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/question-button.jpg" alt="Question" width="116" height="106" align="right" />Hi Kalena</p>
<p>Just wondering what your view was on PR being dead &#8211; it’s what a lot of SEO professionals are saying.</p>
<p>I guess I’m curious also because it seems it’s the only way to be able to track any kind of progress with our linking campaigns. What are your thoughts? Is PR dead?</p>
<p>Sarah<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Hi Sarah</p>
<p>Regarding the death of PageRank, I wouldn&#8217;t go that far. It might be true that webmasters don&#8217;t need to obsess about the little green bar that is the Google Toolbar PageRank score, but the influence of links in Google&#8217;s PageRank algorithm is alive and well.</p>
<p>Just take a look at the <a title="search engine ranking factors" href="http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors" target="_blank">results of the 2009 Ranking Factor survey</a> that SEOmoz gives to 75 top SEO professionals worldwide (me included) every two years.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll see that 4 of the Top 5 Ranking Factors (as agreed by the world&#8217;s busiest SEO practitioners) are link related.</p>
<p>So while Toolbar PageRank scores may not be as indicative as they used to be, link building is still absolutely vital as a way to boost search ranking for a page. Measurement now though is via observation, individual search query rank, number of pages indexed and number of backlinks achieved.</p>
<p>Of particular importance is the flow of linkjuice between inner pages on your own site and the achievement of external links pointing to those inner pages rather than all pointing to your home page.</p>
<p>Kalena</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Got a Reader Rescue question of your own? Send it to kjordan [ at ] sitepronews [ dot ] com and you might see it featured here.</p>

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/26/reader-rescue-is-google-pagerank-dead/">Reader Rescue: Is Google PageRank Dead?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/26/reader-rescue-is-google-pagerank-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Adds Local Trends Tracking Tool</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/23/twitter-adds-local-trends-tracking-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/23/twitter-adds-local-trends-tracking-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kalena Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kalena Jordan's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real time search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=5444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter quietly rolled out a new feature today that enables users to choose a regional preference for viewing trending topics.
Called Twitter Local Trends, the new functionality gives users the option to set their regional location and view trending topics happening in their part of the world. For example, one of the screenshots pictured shows that [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/23/twitter-adds-local-trends-tracking-tool/">Twitter Adds Local Trends Tracking Tool</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/twitter-location-trending1a.jpg" alt="" width="303" height="111" />Twitter quietly rolled out a new feature today that enables users to choose a regional preference for viewing trending topics.</p>
<p>Called Twitter Local Trends, the new functionality gives users the option to set their regional location and view trending topics happening in their part of the world. For example, one of the screenshots pictured shows that the topic &#8220;Trafalgar Square&#8221; is trending for users that have <em>United Kingdom</em> set as their region (because it relates to a well known London icon), but not for users that have set their region to <em>Worldwide</em>.</p>
<p>At this stage, only seven countries and 15 cities in the US are available for selection (see screenshot below) but more will be added soon.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/twitter-location-trending2a.jpg" alt="" width="591" height="199" /></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 10px" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/twitter-location-trending3.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="256" />According to a <a title="Mashable on Local Trends" href="http://mashable.com/2010/01/22/twitter-local-trend/" target="_blank">post on Mashable</a>, the feature has only rolled out to around 1 percent of Twitter users, but there&#8217;s nothing official on the <a title="Twitter Blog" href="http://blog.twitter.com/" target="_blank">Twitter Blog</a> about it yet. I noticed it in my account this afternoon so I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;m part of the lucky 1 percent or whether it has rolled out to a larger audience since it went live this morning.</p>
<p>Regardless, when it does roll out to everyone, it will make a huge difference to how we use Twitter to target a regional audience. The benefits for geo-based mobile apps like <a title="Four Square" href="http://foursquare.com/" target="_blank">Four Square</a> and <a title="Gowalla" href="http://www.gowalla.com" target="_blank">Gowalla</a> should be immediately apparent. Add to that the ability to pinpoint regional trends in real time search and this becomes a social media game changer.</p>
<p>Everybody knows a business that is still sceptical about using Twitter. But when they see they have the power to follow and influence social media conversation in their specific target markets using Local Trends, I think even the sceptics could be convinced to start using Twitter as a full time marketing channel.</p>

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/23/twitter-adds-local-trends-tracking-tool/">Twitter Adds Local Trends Tracking Tool</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/23/twitter-adds-local-trends-tracking-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Addict? Take a Break!</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/19/gmail-addict-take-a-break/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/19/gmail-addict-take-a-break/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kalena Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kalena Jordan's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=5401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of us who work on computers all day can sometimes forget to take regular breaks.
Apart from the health issues of sitting in a confined position for too long, we can become a slave to the PC if we&#8217;re not careful. Consistently checking email, always being available for online chat, logging into various social networks [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/19/gmail-addict-take-a-break/">Gmail Addict? Take a Break!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of us who work on computers all day can sometimes forget to take regular breaks.</p>
<p>Apart from the health issues of sitting in a confined position for too long, we can become a slave to the PC if we&#8217;re not careful. Consistently checking email, always being available for online chat, logging into various social networks &#8211; all these activities can distract you from the important work that needs to be done each day.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/gmail.jpg" alt="" width="117" height="117" />But for <a title="Gmail" href="http://www.gmail.com" target="_blank">Gmail</a> users at least, there is a simple solution available. You may not have noticed, but those clever characters behind <a title="Google Labs" href="http://www.googlelabs.com/" target="_blank">Google Labs</a> added a special feature to Gmail last year called &#8220;Email Addict&#8221;.</p>
<p>When enabled, Email Addict adds a *Take a Break* link to the Gmail navigation at the top right of the screen. When you click on the link, it pops up a message on your screen that says:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Take a walk, get some real work done, or have a snack. We&#8217;ll be back in 14 minutes.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The message fills the screen and prevents you from accessing the application for 14 minutes. It also makes you invisible in chat.</p>
<p>To activate Email Addict, simply:</p>
<p>1) Login to your Gmail account<br />
2) Click on the *Settings* link at the top right<br />
3) Click on the *Labs* tab on the right<br />
4) Scroll down to find *Email Addict* and enable using the radio button</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a nice idea, but you have to manually click on the link to activate it. If you have to remember to take a break and be motivated enough to click the link, it defeats the purpose a little bit, don&#8217;t you think? I&#8217;d prefer if you could set your own timeframe for breaks and have the pop up activate automatically.</p>
<p>Maybe they&#8217;ll add that option in the next version.</p>

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/19/gmail-addict-take-a-break/">Gmail Addict? Take a Break!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/19/gmail-addict-take-a-break/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Implements Their Version of Twitter Retweet</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/17/facebook-implements-their-version-of-twitter-retweet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/17/facebook-implements-their-version-of-twitter-retweet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kalena Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kalena Jordan's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=5386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can now share your Facebook friend&#8217;s posts in a similar manner to the way you retweet a post in Twitter.
According to Mashable, Facebook rolled out the new feature called &#8220;Via&#8221; yesterday. It lets you repost a friend&#8217;s shared items with attribution. The Mashable post explains how it works:
&#8220;To try it, just go to a [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/17/facebook-implements-their-version-of-twitter-retweet/">Facebook Implements Their Version of Twitter Retweet</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can now share your <a title="Facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a> friend&#8217;s posts in a similar manner to the way you retweet a post in Twitter.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/facetweet.jpg" alt="" width="285" height="54" />According to <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/01/16/facebook-via/">Mashable</a>, Facebook rolled out the new feature called <em>&#8220;Via&#8221;</em> yesterday. It lets you repost a friend&#8217;s shared items with attribution. The Mashable post explains how it works:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;To try it, just go to a friend&#8217;s posted item in your news feed, click &#8220;share&#8221; and you&#8217;ll see a &#8220;via [your friend’s name]&#8221; (with an option to remove it). Once shared, the item will appear on your profile, with a via link that points to your friend&#8217;s profile. Your friends will also see the item in their News Feeds, creating the viral loop that is the Twitter (Twitter) retweet.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The feature is only active for posted links and not other items such as status updates or photos. Also, you&#8217;ll only see the *share* link on newsfeed items that are posted for public view (i.e. based on the privacy settings set by the Facebook friend who you are quoting).</p>
<p>The new feature is now live for all Facebook users.</p>

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/17/facebook-implements-their-version-of-twitter-retweet/">Facebook Implements Their Version of Twitter Retweet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/17/facebook-implements-their-version-of-twitter-retweet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Google Helped Haiti</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/14/how-google-helped-haiti/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/14/how-google-helped-haiti/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kalena Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kalena Jordan's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=5357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No doubt you&#8217;ve heard by now of the devastating 7.0 magnitude earthquake that struck Haiti this week.
If you&#8217;ve visited Google.com since then you&#8217;ll see they&#8217;ve given up some home page real estate to highlight the tragic event. The home page now features the following sentence:
&#8220;Information, resources, and ways you can help survivors of the Haiti [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/14/how-google-helped-haiti/">How Google Helped Haiti</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt you&#8217;ve heard by now of the devastating <a title="Haiti earthquake stats" href="http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/us2010rja6.php" target="_blank">7.0 magnitude earthquake</a> that struck Haiti this week.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve visited Google.com since then you&#8217;ll see they&#8217;ve given up some home page real estate to highlight the tragic event. The home page now features the following sentence:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Information, resources, and ways you can help survivors of the Haiti earthquake.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/relief/haitiearthquake/"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/gg-crisis-response.jpg" alt="" width="335" height="96" /></a>The sentence links to an<a title="Haiti disaster relief" href="http://www.google.com/relief/haitiearthquake/" target="_blank"> information page</a> about how the public can help disaster relief in Haiti, complete with donate buttons for UNICEF and CARE, processed by Google checkout.</p>
<p>As well as using their popularity to spread the word, Google has announced they will be donating $1 million to the relief fund.</p>
<p>Not to be outdone, Yahoo and Bing also feature Haiti on their home pages. <a title="Yahoo on Haiti" href="http://www.yahoo.com" target="_blank">Yahoo</a> highlights an article about texting to support Haiti as their lead story and also includes a small link for donation options. <a title="Bing on Haiti" href="http://www.bing.com" target="_blank">Bing</a> features two small links labeled &#8220;<em>How you can help Haiti&#8221;</em> and <em>&#8220;Get the latest earthquake news&#8221;</em> below the fold, at the very bottom of the page.</p>
<p>If you want to donate to Haiti disaster relief, you can visit the Google link above or contact one of the <a title="Haiti charitable organizations" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34835478/ns/world_news-americas/" target="_blank">many charitable organizations</a> in the region directly.</p>

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/14/how-google-helped-haiti/">How Google Helped Haiti</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/14/how-google-helped-haiti/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reader Rescue : Does a longer domain registration period affect ranking?</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/12/reader-rescue-does-a-longer-domain-registration-period-affect-ranking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/12/reader-rescue-does-a-longer-domain-registration-period-affect-ranking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kalena Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kalena Jordan's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=5321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kalena
I was just wondering, does a longer URL registration period have a positive effect on a site&#8217;s search engine ranking?
Thanks,
Louisa
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;
Hi Louisa
Google has confirmed in the past that both domain age and ownership history may impact the way a site is handled by the algorithm, albeit slightly. But what you&#8217;re asking is whether registering a [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/12/reader-rescue-does-a-longer-domain-registration-period-affect-ranking/">Reader Rescue : Does a longer domain registration period affect ranking?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/question-button.jpg" alt="Question" width="116" height="106" align="right" />Hi Kalena</p>
<p>I was just wondering, does a longer URL registration period have a positive effect on a site&#8217;s search engine ranking?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Louisa<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Hi Louisa</p>
<p>Google has confirmed in the past that both domain age and ownership history may impact the way a site is handled by the algorithm, albeit slightly. But what you&#8217;re asking is whether registering a domain for a longer period of time makes a difference to the site&#8217;s ranking?</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t researched this for other search engines, but I recall that a couple of people have <a title="domain registration period question" href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=25b2e69b731ccdad&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">asked this question</a> in the Google Webmaster forum in the past.</p>
<p>Google staff member John Mu <a title="John Mu response" href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=00acf87986f79dfa&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">responded</a> that the length of a domain&#8217;s registration period does NOT impact how Google ranks the site. As he states, many registrars don&#8217;t publish expiration details and so if Google can&#8217;t adequately determine when a site expires, they can&#8217;t compare it to other sites so they don&#8217;t include that as a ranking factor. Besides which, a registration period for a domain doesn&#8217;t reveal much about a site.</p>
<p>The content on the domain is much more important from a search engine perspective than how many years it has been registered for.</p>
<p>Kalena</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Got a Reader Rescue question of your own? Send it to kjordan [ at ] sitepronews [ dot ] com and you might see it featured here.</p>

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/12/reader-rescue-does-a-longer-domain-registration-period-affect-ranking/">Reader Rescue : Does a longer domain registration period affect ranking?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/12/reader-rescue-does-a-longer-domain-registration-period-affect-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shorty Awards Celebrate Twitter Brilliance</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/11/shorty-awards-celebrate-twitter-brilliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/11/shorty-awards-celebrate-twitter-brilliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kalena Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kalena Jordan's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=5317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re a Twitter fan, you probably already know that the second annual Shorty Awards are underway. If not, then let me explain.
The Shorty Awards are a celebration of excellent Twitter content, as voted by the community. Voting is now open in 27 official categories such as tech, humor, weird, government, news and art, but [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/11/shorty-awards-celebrate-twitter-brilliance/">Shorty Awards Celebrate Twitter Brilliance</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 10px" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/shorty-awards.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="153" />If you&#8217;re a Twitter fan, you probably already know that the second annual <a title="Shorty Awards" href="http://shortyawards.com/rules" target="_blank">Shorty Awards</a> are underway. If not, then let me explain.</p>
<p>The Shorty Awards are a celebration of excellent Twitter content, as voted by the community. Voting is now open in 27 official categories such as tech, humor, weird, government, news and art, but votes are also being accepted in unofficial, crowd-sourced categories.</p>
<p>To vote, send a tweet like this:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;I nominate @TwitterUser for a Shorty Award in #category because&#8230; (add reason here).&#8221; </em></p>
<p>You can do this on Twitter.com, with any Twitter client, or using the voting box on the <a title="Shorty Awards" href="http://shortyawards.com/" target="_blank">Shorty Award site</a>.</p>
<p>In February, the nominees will be narrowed down to five finalists in each category, with winners determined by a combination of popular vote and by the members of the Real-Time Academy of Short Form Arts &amp; Sciences. In March, an awards ceremony, complete with 140-character acceptance speeches, will be held in New York City and live streamed on the web.</p>
<p>If you missed out on a Shorty last year, never fear. You&#8217;ve got the whole of January to garner votes and topple the early leaders.</p>

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/11/shorty-awards-celebrate-twitter-brilliance/">Shorty Awards Celebrate Twitter Brilliance</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/11/shorty-awards-celebrate-twitter-brilliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reader Rescue: Do I have to disable Google personalization settings to check client rankings?</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/08/reader-rescue-do-i-have-to-disable-google-personalization-settings-to-check-client-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/08/reader-rescue-do-i-have-to-disable-google-personalization-settings-to-check-client-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kalena Jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kalena Jordan's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalized search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reader rescue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepronews.com/?p=5300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hi Kalena
In the past, I made sure I was not logged in to Google when I checked my Client website standings in search. But, now are we going to have to clear *Web History* and Disable customizations every time we want to check our client&#8217;s rankings manually?
This article claims that Google&#8217;s new &#8216;cookie&#8217; extends Personalized [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/08/reader-rescue-do-i-have-to-disable-google-personalization-settings-to-check-client-rankings/">Reader Rescue: Do I have to disable Google personalization settings to check client rankings?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://www.ask-kalena.com/images/question-button.jpg" alt="Question" width="116" height="106" align="right" /></p>
<p>Hi Kalena</p>
<p>In the past, I made sure I was not logged in to Google when I checked my Client website standings in search. But, now are we going to have to clear *Web History* and Disable customizations every time we want to check our client&#8217;s rankings manually?</p>
<p><a title="article about Google personalization" href="http://www.cio.com/article/print/510077" target="_blank">This article</a> claims that Google&#8217;s new &#8216;cookie&#8217; extends Personalized Results to All Users. Here&#8217;s a quote: <em> &#8220;Google has begun using a cookie placed on users&#8217; machines to track their search behavior and offer personalized recommendations, even when they are not logged into a Google account.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Mitch<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Hi Mitch</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that Google have <a title="Google extends personalized search to all users" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/personalized-search-for-everyone.html" target="_blank">extended Personalized Search to all users</a>, whether they&#8217;re signed in or signed out of a Google account. But you can turn history-based customization off &#8211; both temporarily and permanently. The method of turning it off differs depending on whether you&#8217;re logged in or out of Google, but in both cases the <a title="turning off personalization" href="http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=54048" target="_blank">instructions are very simple</a>.</p>
<p>Probably the easiest thing is to run your searches as normal and check to see if the SERPs you&#8217;re seeing have been customized based on personalization. As per Google&#8217;s official blog post:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;You&#8217;ll know when we customize results because a &#8220;View customizations&#8221; link will appear on the top right of the search results page. Clicking the link will let you see how we&#8217;ve customized your results and also let you turn off this type of customization.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>You can then choose to view the same SERPs without customization to ensure you know how the results look to persons who have opted out of personalized SERPs. But keep in mind that personalization has been in place since 2005 and SERPs all look slightly different to everybody.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s really no such thing as a consistent SERP in Google so traditional *rankings* are somewhat meaningless today. I know that&#8217;s sometimes a difficult thing to explain to a client, but it&#8217;s true!</p>
<p>For more on how Google Personalization does or doesn&#8217;t impact SEO, you might like to read my SPN article: <a title="Can SEO Exist Beyond Google Personalization" href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2009/12/13/can-seo-exist-beyond-google-personalization/" target="_blank">Can SEO Exist Beyond Google Personalization?</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Got a Reader Rescue question of your own? Send it to kjordan [ at ] sitepronews [ dot ] com and you might see it featured here.</p>

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sitepronews.com">SiteProNews: Webmaster News &amp; Resources</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/08/reader-rescue-do-i-have-to-disable-google-personalization-settings-to-check-client-rankings/">Reader Rescue: Do I have to disable Google personalization settings to check client rankings?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sitepronews.com/2010/01/08/reader-rescue-do-i-have-to-disable-google-personalization-settings-to-check-client-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
